The Transvaluation of the Theory of Economic Policy

Katherine Moos
Written By SCEPA

WORKING PAPER

DOWNLOAD PDF

(583 KB)

This paper entertains two distinct hypotheses about the meaning and effect of the Lucas critique.

The first is that the Lucas critique represents advancement in the theory of economic policy. To accept this interpretation, we will have to find evidence that the Lucas critique is empirically valid, ontologically rigorous, and theoretically sound. In search of such evidence, we will review the writings of economists both within and outside the profession’s mainstream that engage the Lucas critique on these criteria. The alternative hypothesis considered in this paper is that in denouncing the traditional theory of economic policy, Lucas sparked an ideational shift in how macroeconomists understand the meaning and value of policy.

SCEPA
Previous

The Contribution of Expenditure Growth and Expenditure Switching
Next

Expectations and Stability in the Kaleckian Growth Model